The Bank does not intend to respond to further correspondence regarding this matter.
By: Libi Uremovic | Original Article at patch.com
“What did Union Bank do with that $16 Million?” is call sarcasm. I wasn’t expecting a response to Felony Municipal Bond Fraud and Embezzlement – save it for the Federal Courts.
The ‘court ruling’ was to document that the Corporate Office of Union Bank was fully aware of their involvement in Felony Municipal Bond Fraud and Embezzlement. Emails sent to Union Bank Employees is simply an FYI that I’m wrapping that rope around your necks.
Union Bank doesn’t have to respond, they don’t even have to read the emails. The emails are simply to verify the Corporate Office’s compliance in Felony Municipal Bond Fraud and Embezzlement. I notice that Union Bank has never been shocked or even mildly concerned that they are committing Felony Municipal Bond Fraud and Embezzlement.
By the looks of the job title; David Ursa is the one orchestrating Felony Municipal Bond Fraud and Embezzlement. Good to know.
David Ursa
October 20, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Libi Uremovic
RE: Beaumont Missing $16 Million in Refinanced Bonds
Ms. Uremovic:
The Bank recently received email communication from you regarding the above-referenced matter [or City of Beaumont]. Please be advised that, in keeping with the court’s ruling, the Bank does not intend to respond to further correspondence regarding this matter.
Respectfully,
David Ursa, CCTS
Managing Director
Group Head
Corporate Trust Services
Transaction Banking
MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
350 California, 11th Floor
San Francisco CA 94104
T: +1-415-273-2449
M: +1-630-542-5190
A member of MUFG, a global financial group